Showing posts with label Green Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Green Culture. Show all posts

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Good Housekeeping Green Seal

Green Certifications: 
Good Housekeeping Green Seal


Though I compiled this information for a study on greenwashing and laundry detergent, the information pertaining to the label and certification may extend into other types of products. When in doubt, be an informed consumer and read, read, read! I try to link and reference all of my findings. - Janna


The Good Housekeeping Green label has a spot in my Green Washing laundry study because of the seven products listed on the GH site as having this certification, Tide Coldwater liquid laundry detergent is one of them. I was a little surprised, because of the many many Tide bottles I saw during this study, none of them had this seal. I tried images online, and none of the Coldwater bottles have it. Perhaps the certification expires; perhaps the seal is not something brands put on their labeling but something that serves as an in-house warranty for subscribers of Good Housekeeping. It's hard to tell how old the list of items is, as there is no date anywhere on the page... and the list is an 7 item slideshow. The seal was introduced in 2009, The seal seems largely based on how "green" the manufacturing process or material sourcing is.

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Green Seal Label

Green Certifications:
Green Seal Label

Though I compiled this information for a study on greenwashing and laundry detergent, the information pertaining to the label and certification may extend into other types of products. When in doubt, be an informed consumer and read, read, read! I try to link and reference all of my findings. - Janna


Green Seal is a third-party certification for goods and services. The company Green Seal, Inc. is a non-profit organization that started in 1989, when there were no other environmental certification programs (GreenSeal, 2011). The mark may appear on a product label, a hotel or restaurant brochure, or a custodian's uniform.

Green Seal certifies household cleaners, specialty cleaners, laundry care products, cleaning services, bath soap and shampoo, personal care and cosmetic products, printing paper, kitchen papers (coffee filters and more), compact fluorescent bulbs, paints, recycled latex paint, windows, and stains and finishes. Each has it's own set of standards.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

EPA DFE and Safer Choice labels

Green Certifications:
US EPA DFE / Safer Choice


Though I compiled this information for a study on greenwashing and laundry detergent, the information pertaining to the label and certification may extend into other types of products. When in doubt, be an informed consumer and read, read, read! I try to link and reference all of my findings. - Janna

The United State's Environmental Protection Agency started the Design for the Environment (DFE) label in 1992 and became the  Safer Choice label in 2015 February. The requirements did not change with the design, and some products still carry the older label. (At the time of my study Purex Natural Elements still had the DFE label (2015 November). However, the label is now a small family of labels, denoting various uses. 

Monday, November 11, 2013

Anthropology of Nature: Week 11 - 20131111

This blog entry is part of a project for the class Anthropology of Nature. 

Week 11, technically one day late, on a three day weekend. Eek.
However, I have much opportunity to view the interaction of humans and nature/environment this week. It's been a busy week.

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Anthropology of Nature: TedTalk Seed Saving

This blog entry is part of a project for the class Anthropology of Nature. 

2013 October 03
Seeds

1. How might such solutions, products, or knowledge change your life?
The 'product' in question is the Svalbard Global Seed Bank (1). The 'solution' offered by this product is the preservation of food-crop seeds through coordinated seed saving. The problem this solution address is the loss of agricultural biodiversity through climate change and mono-cropping. Mono-cropping is the agricultural process of growing just one type of plant. Usually this refers to growing only corn, season after season, instead of engaging in crop-rotation, but it also refers to growing just one type of that corn, usually one species.

This single-species monocropping is dangerous, even when not considering climate change. Diversity is the resource natural selection uses to make sure life continues. Consider the best known case of monocropping failure: Ireland's Great (Potato) Famine. Most have heard of it. One third of the farmers of Ireland grew one species of potato, but a fungus came and decimated this species of potato crop. Over a million people died of starvation, and a million more emigrated from Ireland (2). An example you might not have heard of, is the banana. Did you ever notice that banana-flavoring does not really taste like bananas? Well, it does. It tastes like the banana species that used to be common in US stores, the Gros Michel. A fungus wilt wiped out vast tracts of banana trees. After this catastrophe, growers switched to the Dwarf Cavendish, the species you eat today. All of the common bananas you have ever purchased from a United States grocery store are genetically identical. They are clones. They do not even have seeds; those tiny black spots in the banana are the remnants of what would develop into seeds in a wild plant.

The saving of seeds would prevent the extinction of crop species. Not only is there an intrinsic value in protecting the biodiversity of our environment, but this seed saving gives the human species options if climate change or blight makes us unable to grow the crops we currently subsist on.

2. What is innovative about the product or idea presented?
The Svalbard Global Seed Bank utilized an existing structure, an old mine, to create the bank itself. The facility takes advantage of the freezing landscape as natural refrigeration for the seed bank, as the best way to save seeds is to dry them and freeze them (1). Its purpose is not unique, as there other seedbanks, but their common goal is innovative: conserve something that is not actually being used, because the world might need it.

3. Why does the solution, products, or knowledge benefit the planet?
As stated, biodiversity gives us options. If every welsh sheepdog on the planet spontaneously perished, ranchers could turn to bearded collies to herd their stock. If your favorite pen dies, but you still need to write your paper, you turn to another pen even if the blue is not quite the same color, because you NEED to finish the paper. The stock NEEDS to be herded. Humans NEED agriculture. It is arguable that human civilization, as it stands now, only exists because of the development of agriculture. It makes sense to protect our future agriculture through the preservation of threatened species and conservation of redundant species.

4. How does the solution, products, or knowledge transform human-nature relationships?
The idea that agriculture is variable, that the foods we eat are not always available year round or in our hometowns, tends to only register in our minds when we see the cost of fruits and vegetables in the grocery store. Apples because less expensive in the fall, for example. The loss of biodiverstity profoundly affects humans by changing their environment; it changes what is available to them from their environment. Seed saving projects aim to prevent that by encouraging the view that we are part of this changing environment and can and will be affected by it, period. By promoting the knowledge of the need to save biodiversity, it promotes the notions of human-environment connectedness.

5. Identify possible pitfalls in the solutions, products, and knowledge presented.
The Svalbard Global Seed Bank actually only save agricultural crop species. Essentially, even in trying to save food plant biodiversity we are looking at food plants through a distinctly ethnocentric lens. Have Westerners stored seeds of the Balsam Apple vine? The plant is poisonous when ripe, but unripe cukes are edible, though bitter. It is arguable that no one facility or organization can save everything, so it is necessary to continue the idea with other seed banks that focus on saving other types. For example, the Millenium Seed Bank Project in Sussex, London, England, saves 'wild plant' seeds. They currently have the largest number of seed species, reaching one billion in April 2007. In October 2009, it reached its 10% goal of banking all the world's wild plant species by adding Musa itinerans, a wild banana, to its seed vault. As estimates for the number of seed bearing plant species have increased, the current 33,187 species that have been banked represent 11.06% of the global total (4). It could be argued that the Svalbard facility is actually the small focus facility for the Millennium project. Either way, redundancy is key, and that makes multiple seed banks, in multiple locations, necessary.

Resources
1. http://www.ted.com/talks/cary_fowler_one_seed_at_a_time_protecting_the_future_of_food.html
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Ireland)
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gros_Michel_banana
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Seed_Bank_Project

If you are really interested in the idea of seed saving, I can offer you two interesting works of Fiction that revolves around it. Treasure Planet, an animated movie based in a future that seems a lot like Treasure Island, and revolves around the discovery of a seed ark that could save the dwindling human species, and City of Pearl by Karen Traviss. The latter includes an interesting look at what could happen if agriculture becomes dominated by corporations and their trademarked crop species, but includes the discovery of a seek ark that could save Earth from these corporations.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Anthropology of Nature: Getting a feel for the Nature Journal...

This blog entry is part of a project for a college course, Anthropology of Nature.

Some Class Reflections:

When I was younger I wanted to be a forensic anthropologist. I thought it was amusing when the author, Townsend, of 'Pigs to Policies' all but rolled her eyes at the notion that people hearing the word 'anthropologist' first think "bones and bodies" or forensic anthropology. Though I was honestly more interested in the bodies than any kind of linguistics or archaeology (though I love reading about archaeology) and therefore steered myself more towards Biology.

I think I still would have been happy in anthropology. I like to gripe about disliking "humans" but when I first started going to college I took as much psychology and religion courses as I could. People told me they were separate fields, even the teachers said they weren't connected. I always felt that you couldn't describe history or culture or gender views or anything else without seeing the interplay of religion (really a summary word for "all of our superstitions and cultural habits woven into a single cord"). Combine that with how these people interact with the world around them and bam! Basically, anthropology. Still, probably not as much formaldehyde as I'd prefer. Cest la vie. Maybe, as a second bachelors somewhere along the way.

Observations of Environmental Anthropology in the Specimen "Me":

I'm very excited about the upcoming beach cleanup in September. I was super excited to get to announce it to the class. I don't think the email I tried to send through Blackboard worked, since it sent it to me, but I'll try again. I'd love to get more of these kids to go help out, even if it's basically two-point bribery. Maybe they'll see how fun it is.

I want to use this subheading to analyze how my views change about nature and my role in it. I've been everything from a dirt-worshipping tree-hugger to as lazy as the modern man can be (being guilty of throwing away food is probably the epitome of wealth and laziness). I'm currently somewhere in the middle. The courses I've taken for my environmental science degree have left me a little cynical about some staples of "environmental friendliness", like recycling. I still want to save the world though.

Ethnography of the South Floridian:

I want to use this subheading to record information, cultural-anthropologist-style, about South Floridians. Specifically, I want to pay closer attention to how they interact with their natural environment. This might take some "sit time" in various places, and maybe I can apply it to "how many students trashed recyclable paper" etc. I want to try to focus each week's information gathering along the class themes for that week. This week we mentioned Economic systems altering the human-nature intersection previously in place. We also mentioned food taboos and "witches", but since this isn't any sort of religion or gender course I'll try to leave those alone.

Water bottles. Easy target. As I wrote this a student used the pop machine next to me to buy a bottle of water. Besides the fact that they're less regulated than the tap water (do so much poorer than tap water in microbacterial tests and contaminant tests) and so much more expensive than the literally* free water here at the school, she shoved her paper money into the machine to purchase water that media (the shaper of culture for good or ill) told her was cleaner and more convenient than the drinking fountain. The plastic bottle will be drained (probably) and then discarded. Hopefully it gets deposited into a recycle bin, but so little of it gets recycled anyway (le sigh). The technology (basically a windowed refrigerator) combined with the media imperative to buy SAFE and CONVENIENT water, has drawn people away from the safe and convenient water fountains.

*Literally* I use this in the honest dictionary term, not the new dictionary term "for emphasis". To the student the water in the fountain is free. Bring a reusable cup or sturdy non-BPA bottle and you could have all the free water you want, and all of it backed by EPA's water quality tests (conducted every few minutes due to the rate at which is flows through the pipelines, dontchaknow)!


Hmm. I think I'll end the journal there. Otherwise it'll become a rant.