Education
adequacy is defined as a legal approach that ensures educational opportunities
to poorer students based on state constitution guarantees for efficient,
thorough, and uniform education (Sadker A-13). It is an approach that seeks to
find the minimum a school and student must have and know in order to provide
that for them. It is not something that ensures those poorer students receive
the same quality and level of education that more wealthy students receive; it
is not “education equity”.
One of the
reasons all schools are not created equal, though the students attending them
are deemed so under the Constitution, is that the money funding those schools
comes from the tax-payers. In a system where property taxes fund the school of
the children paying those property taxes a wealthy neighborhood will have a
more funded school compared to the school of a poorer neighborhood. Those who
lobby for education equity seek a funding system that pools the money of both
the poor and the wealthy neighborhood and divides the money between the two
schools in such a way that the students of each receives a similar quality of
education. This kind of system tends to meet resistance from the wealthier
parents who subscribe to a form of education Darwinism. To these parents they
have earned the money they pay into their school and thereby earned a better
education for their offspring. The poorer parents argue that their children are
equal citizens and should receive equal “protection” for their right to
education in the form of monetary help. Poorer schools without this help may
end up with inadequate books, unqualified teachers (Sadker 306), and therefore
an inadequate education preventing the students from attaining a method of
escaping the poverty cycle.
Attaining
educational equity between schools is obviously a difficult matter. Some states
have made steps to improve the educational situation of the impoverished by
creating legislation for more adequate education but the terms are general may
be interpreted in a variety of ways. Some states require “sound basic”
education, and others “thorough”, some “efficient” (Sadker 309). Without
statistical data on monetary requirements of schools and legislation towards
meeting that requirement, these “standards” are little more than hopeful goals.
Sadker, David Miller. Teachers, Schools, and Society, 2010 McGraw-Hill. New York.
Image: "South Carolina public school funding 2009-2010" Posted on July 8, 2009. Accessed 2012 Nov 27. [http://thevoiceforschoolchoice.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/south-carolina-public-school-funding-2009-2010/]
No comments:
Post a Comment